Okay, so you're saying exception handling is easy and simple, right?, C++ FAQ

C++ FAQ

From Marshall Cline: Bjarne Stroustrup, Herb Sutter, Andrei Alexandrescu, Pearson / Addison-Wesley Publishers and I collaborated to create a new C++ Super-FAQ! It's a team effort, with huge contributions from each of us and with amazing support from dozens of brilliant editors. The result is "awesomer" than ever! I originally wrote/published the FAQ in 1991 and now look forward to this new phase - and to continue working with it for another 20 years!

On a personal note, I'm at Oculus VR and it is amazing - fabulous people doing fabulous work. We're hiring more fabulous people so write me if that's you!

FAQ: Okay, so you're saying exception handling is easy and simple, right? ←(in the new Super-FAQ)

It's in Section: Exceptions and error handling:

FAQ: What are some ways try / catch / throw can improve software quality?
FAQ: Do the benefits of exceptions show up with tiny programs?
FAQ: How do exceptions simplify my function return type and parameter types?
FAQ: Do exceptions separate the "happy path" from the "bad path"?
FAQ: Okay, so you're saying exception handling is easy and simple, right? (this FAQ)
FAQ: Mindset and discipline for exception handling?
FAQ: I have too many try blocks; what can I do about it?
FAQ: How can I handle a constructor that fails?
FAQ: How can I handle a destructor that fails?
FAQ: How should I handle resources if my constructors may throw exceptions?
FAQ: How to prevent memory leaks when exceptions are thrown?
FAQ: What should I throw?
FAQ: What should I catch?
FAQ: But MFC seems to encourage the use of catch-by-pointer; should I do the same?
FAQ: Meaning and use of throw; (without an object)?
FAQ: How do I throw polymorphically?
FAQ: When I throw this object, how many times will it be copied?