Whoa, but what about machines or compilers that support multibyte characters. Are you saying that a "character" and a char might be different?!?, C++ FAQ

C++ FAQ

From Marshall Cline: Bjarne Stroustrup, Herb Sutter, Andrei Alexandrescu, Pearson / Addison-Wesley Publishers and I collaborated to create a new C++ Super-FAQ! It's a team effort, with huge contributions from each of us and with amazing support from dozens of brilliant editors. The result is "awesomer" than ever! I originally wrote/published the FAQ in 1991 and now look forward to this new phase - and to continue working with it for another 20 years!

On a personal note, I'm at Oculus VR and it is amazing - fabulous people doing fabulous work. We're hiring more fabulous people so write me if that's you!

FAQ: Whoa, but what about machines or compilers that support multibyte characters. Are you saying that a "character" and a `char` might be different?!? ←(in the new Super-FAQ)

It's in Section: Built-in / intrinsic / primitive data types:

FAQ: Can sizeof(char) be 2 on some machines? For example, what about double-byte characters?
FAQ: What are the units of sizeof?
FAQ: Whoa, but what about machines or compilers that support multibyte characters. Are you saying that a "character" and a char might be different?!? (this FAQ)
FAQ: But, but, but what about machines where a char has more than 8 bits? Surely you're not saying a C++ byte might have more than 8 bits, are you?!?
FAQ: Okay, I could imagine a machine with 9-bit bytes. But surely not 16-bit bytes or 32-bit bytes, right?
FAQ: I'm sooooo confused. Would you please go over the rules about bytes, chars, and characters one more time?
FAQ: What is a "POD type"?
FAQ: When initializing non-static data members of built-in / intrinsic / primitive types, should I use the "initialization list" or assignment?
FAQ: When initializing static data members of built-in / intrinsic / primitive types, should I worry about the "static initialization order fiasco"?
FAQ: Can I define an operator overload that works with built-in / intrinsic / primitive types?
FAQ: When I delete an array of some built-in / intrinsic / primitive type, why can't I just say delete a instead of delete[] a?
FAQ: How can I tell if an integer is a power of two without looping?
FAQ: What should be returned from a function?